"We will not get too involved in the [[Chekhovian]] dilemmas in the private lives of Marc and Janet, but their case provides a very common illustration of the emotional effect of survivorship bias. "Janet feels that her husband is a failure, by comparison, **but she is miscomputing the probabilities in a gross manner—she is using the wrong distribution to derive a rank**. As compared to the general U.S. population, Marc has done very well, better than 99.5% of his compatriots. As compared to his high school friends, he did extremely well, a fact that he could have verified had he had time to attend the periodic reunions, and he would come at the top. As compared to the other people at Harvard, he did better than 90% of them (financially, of course). As compared to his law school comrades at Yale, he did better than 60% of them. "But as compared to his co-op neighbors, he is at the bottom! Why? **Because he chose to live among the people who have been successful, in an area that excludes failure**. "In other words, those who have failed do not show up in the sample, thus making him look as if he were not doing well at all. By living on [[Park Avenue]], one does not have exposure to the losers, one only sees the winners. As we are cut to live in very small communities, it is difficult to assess our situation outside of the narrowly defined geographic confines of our habitat. In the case of Marc and Janet, **this leads to considerable emotional distress; here we have a woman who married an extremely successful man but all she can see is comparative failure, for she cannot emotionally compare him to a sample that would do him justice**." --- **Tags** -- [[quotes]], [[survivorship-bias]], [[swimmer-body-illusion]], [[statistics]], [[probability-distributions]], [[envy]], [[environmental-design]], [[clustering-illusion]], [[work-life-balance]], [[causation]] **Source** -- [[202410121132 - B - Fooled by Randomness]]